I first have to repeat that, with some very few exceptions, I don't l ike Tourbillons on the dial side, when they make a " hole " in the dial.
I much prefer them being part of the dial, I mean without hole, or in the back side.
Here is a typical case of these few exceptions: You have a hole, ok, but what a delicate candy!
The sweet guilloché of the dial is just sublime, and even the non colored gold guy I am can appreciate and even like the blend of rose gold and platinum of the case.
A blend which enhances the preciousness of a Watch whose ( relatively ) small 36 mm case avoids to generate the feeling of a " in your face " Watch.
Not show off at all, just elegance!
Ok, one think I would have preferred is to be able to see more of this movement ( Cal 558 ) rather than this mainplate which hides all, on the back side, even if nicely engraved.
Here are the few pictures I could take:
If I got it well, this is a reference which was produced in the 90ies.
That is the Breguet I like!
Best,
Nicolas
This message has been edited by amanico on 2014-04-13 03:47:20